Criminal Defense in Your Neck of the Woods
Criminal Defense Lawyer
407.878.7855
520 W. Lake Mary Blvd., Suite 103,
Sanford, Fl 32773
Criminal Defense in Your Neck of the Woods
Yes, I acknowledge that I have read and understand the above information and would like to view the case results below.
No, I would not like to view this information. (Please click here to return to home page.)
Case: |
State of Florida vs. XX, Seminole County, Sanford, Florida |
Judge: |
The Honorable Carmine Bravo |
Charge(s): | Battery |
Arresting Agency: | Seminole County |
Facts: | XX was arrested for allegedly pushing his former girlfriend to the ground during an exchange of their shared minor child. Despite the fact that the Defendant and Victim were mired in a custody dispute and potential ulterior motives; the State refused to drop charges. |
Defense: | With no other option Ryan was forced to take XX's case to trial and fight with fervor because more than just the client's freedom was on the line. The victim and her friend testified as well as the Defendant. XX testified that he never touched the victim. At the conclusion of the case the Jury believed XX. |
Result: | Not Guilty Verdict. Charges dismissed. |
Case: |
State of Florida vs. XX, Seminole County, Sanford, Florida |
Judge: |
The Honorable Mark E. Herr |
Charge(s): | Domestic Violence Battery |
Arresting Agency: | Altamonte Springs |
Facts: | XX and his girlfriend allegedly had a loud argument in their shared apartment. Law enforcement was called and found the alleged victim with no injury who stated nothing had happened. Nevertheless, XX was arrested. |
Defense: | The alleged victim continued to maintain that XX did not touch her; however, the State refused to drop charges. Ryan was forced to take the case to trial, at trial the State could not prove any evidence of a battery, their case was so lacking the Judge dismissed the charges before the jury could decide. |
Result: | Judgment of Acquittal. Charges dismissed. |
Case: |
XX v. XX, Seminole County, Sanford, Florida |
Judge: |
The Honorable Nancy Alley |
Charge(s): | Domestic Violence Injunction |
Arresting Agency: | Sanford Police Department |
Facts: | The Respondent, XX, allegedly choked the mother of his girlfriend. |
Defense: | Ryan after cross examination was able to persuade the judge that the alleged victim's story was not credible. |
Result: | Injunction dismissed |
Case: |
State of Florida vs. XX, Seminole County, Sanford, Florida |
Judge: |
The Honorable John L. Woodard |
Charge(s): | Domestic Violence Battery |
Arresting Agency: | Sanford Police Department |
Facts: | XX was arrested for allegedly striking his wife. When the police arrived there was little physical evidence; nonetheless, XX was arrested. |
Defense: | The State at first refused to drop charges; however, the alleged victim via a sworn statement recanted her reasons for calling police and the State was forced to drop charges. |
Result: | Nolle Prosequi. All charges dropped. |
Case: |
State of Florida vs. XX, Seminole County, Sanford, Florida |
Judge: |
The Honorable Mark Herr |
Charge(s): | Domestic Violence Battery |
Arresting Agency: | Oviedo Police Department |
Facts: | Pre-trial Diversion was offered to KS for allegedly striking her boyfriend. |
Defense: | Diversion |
Result: | Nolle Prosequi. All charges dropped. |
Case: |
State of Florida vs. XX, Seminole County, Sanford, Florida |
Judge: |
The Honorable John L. Woodard |
Charge(s): | Domestic Violence Battery |
Arresting Agency: | Seminole County |
Facts: | XX allegedly struck his long time girl friend several times. |
Defense: | Early intervention by Ryan |
Result: | No charges filed |
Case: |
XX vs. XX, Seminole County, Sanford, Florida |
Judge: |
The Honorable Linda Schoonover |
Case(s): | Petition for Protection Against Domestic Violence |
Arresting Agency: | Altamonte Springs |
Facts: | Following XX's arrest for domestic violence battery as is often the case, XX also filed a temporary injunction, commonly referred to as a restraining order. XX's injunction also kept him from his minor child. XX maintained he never touched his wife; however, she stated he threw her into a wall. |
Defense: | At the evidentiary hearing Ryan cross examined the Petitioner XX and had her confess admissions that were ultimately greatly against the validity of her case. |
Result: | Injunction dismissed |
Case: |
State of Florida vs. XX, Seminole County, Sanford, Florida |
Judge: |
The Honorable Mark E. Herr |
Charge(s): | Obscene Phone Call |
Arresting Agency: | Altamonte Springs |
Facts: | XX was on trial for allegedly making threats and "nasty" phone calls to his estranged wife and mother of his children. |
Defense: | This "War of the Roses" was nothing more than a he said she said story, the State did not have any recordings of the phone call. |
Result: | Not Guilty |
Case: |
State of Florida vs. XX, Seminole County, Sanford, Florida |
Judge: |
The Honorable James Dekleva |
Charge(s): | Domestic Violence Battery |
Arresting Agency: | Altamonte Springs |
Facts: | XX was charged with pushing his wife into a wall during a dispute about their upcoming divorce. |
Defense: | The defense was that any injury was self inflicted and the basis of gaining an upper hand in the divorce. |
Result: | Not Guilty |
Case: |
State of Florida vs. XX, Seminole County, Sanford, Florida |
Judge: |
The Honorable Mark E. Herr |
Charge(s): | Domestic Violence Assault |
Arresting Agency: | Altamonte Springs |
Facts: | WR was in the midst of a divorce with two minor children; the victim claimed WR threatened to kill her with a firearm. |
Defense: | Ryan disclosed a surveillance video of XX's business where the crime allegedly occurred. The video had no audio; nonetheless, the video showed the victim was the actual aggressor. The defense was that this case was another example of a party attempting to gain an advantage in family court through the criminal justice system, the jury agreed |
Result: | Not Guilty |
Case: |
State of Florida vs. XX, Seminole County, Sanford, Florida |
Judge: |
The Honorable Mark Herr |
Charge(s): | Domestic Violence Battery |
Arresting Agency: | Altamonte Springs Police Department |
Facts: | Pre-trial Diversion was offered to XX for allegedly striking his wife's adult daughter. XX denied all charges; however, could not risk a conviction on his record for employment purposes. |
Defense: | Diversion |
Result: | Nolle Prosequi. All charges dropped. |
Case: |
State of Florida vs. XX, Seminole County, Sanford, Florida |
Judge: |
The Honorable Marlene Alva |
Charge(s): | Aggravated Battery |
Arresting Agency: | Sanford Police Department |
Facts: | XX allegedly choked the mother of his children during a dispute about time share. |
Defense: | Early intervention with the Office of The State Attorney |
Result: | No charges filed |
Case: |
State of Florida vs. VE, Seminole County, Sanford, Florida |
Judge: |
The Honorable O.H. Eaton Jr. |
Charge(s): | Battery on a Person 65 years or older |
Arresting Agency: | Sanford Police Department |
Facts: | XX allegedly struck an elderly friend, no physical evidence was available and the alleged victim did no what charges to go forward. |
Defense: | Early intervention with the Office of The State Attorney |
Result: | No charges filed |
Case: |
State of Florida vs. XX, Seminole County, Sanford, Florida |
Judge: |
The Honorable Mark Herr |
Charge(s): | Domestic Violence Battery |
Arresting Agency: | Altamonte Springs Police Department |
Facts: | Pre-trial Diversion to XX after he allegedly struck his wife during a dispute concerning an upcoming divorce. Ryan through much lobbying with the prosecutor was able to have diversion referred. |
Defense: | Diversion |
Result: | Nolle Prosequi. All charges dropped. |
Case: |
XX vs. XX, Seminole County, Sanford, Florida |
Judge: |
The Honorable Jerri Collins |
Charge(s): | Dating Violence Injunction |
Arresting Agency: | |
Facts: | XX and YY were no longer dating; however, XX could not get over YY. As a form of harassment YY filed an injunction against XX. |
Defense: | Ryan was able to demonstrate to YY's attorney there was no legitimate case; as a result YY voluntarily dismissed the injunction. |
Result: | Injunction dismissed |